![]() ![]() Indeed, since the first release, it has been possible to install and run Diaspora on Mac OS, which is completely non-free. I implore the Diaspora project to cease participation in distribution of a nonfree program, and I suggest that those who find that program convenient join in developing a free replacement for it.Ĭould someone point out what is the relevance of Stallman's view to Diaspora? Last time I checked he wasn't involved in the project (and never has been).ĭiaspora has never insisted that only Free Software can be used in anything involving Diaspora's software. What that says to people is, "Freedom is not important." In the long run, it undermines the love of freedom that would motivate why people to contribute to Diaspora. It is direct participation in the distribution of that program. To offer people licenses for a proprietary program is more than just an endorsement. The real issue is not what people can use, it is what the Diaspora project endorses and does. If they want to surrender their freedom by privately running a nonfree program, youĬould not stop them normally you would not even know. People don't need the approval of the Diaspora project for what they use privately. ![]() Richard Stallman about this, and i got this response:ĭavid Thompson asserted that it would be a "problem" if you "had to" use only freedom-respecting software to develop Diaspora. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |